VIDEO: RIGHT OF REPLY By Suzie Dawson, Kim Dotcom & The Internet Party

1/10/2017

VIDEO: RIGHT OF REPLY By Suzie Dawson, Kim Dotcom & The Internet Party

The views and opinions expressed in this video by Suzie Dawson do not represent the views of Vinny Eastwood Or Postman Investigates.
In order to ensure transparent reporting,
All political parties WILL be given a right of reply to tell their side.
Vinny Eastwood

What I love about this video is that she doesn't mention the fact that EVERY SINGLE PART of that script was written by journalist Ben Vidgen NOT ME and was backed up by at least 3 sources. What's better is that every single one of her counter claims is backed up by 0 sources and she repeats herself over and over as if that constitutes evidence. And waits till the very end of the video (59m) before she realises that it was BEN VIDGEN who wrote the piece and she admits that she not only does not know who he is, but never even bothered to check before rambling on about me for an hour!

Watch On Youtube: RIGHT OF REPLY: Suzie Dawson, Kim Dotcom & The Internet Party https://youtu.be/p9iWxzysg2A

Suzies Original Post On Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/SuzieOccupyEarth/videos/10154882543290848/?hc_location=ufi

Original Election Series Episode On The Internet Party, Kim Dotcom & Suzie Dawson: http://www.thevinnyeastwoodshow.com/vinny-mr-news-eastwoods-blog/who-are-you-really-voting-for-the-internet-party-kimdotcom-nz-election-series-part-9-final-episode

3 Comments

john hieatt

1/10/2017 07:45:27 pm

What Suzie says about penny bright is absolute rubbish. Penny is not vindictive against fellow activists and has integrity. i have personally worked with Penny on a lot of campaigns over the last 5 years and during this time i have gained much respect for her and the way she goes about her business. Penny always does due diligence before she acts.

Thomas Gibbs

1/10/2017 08:02:06 pm

Suzie is completely, probably diagnosably, crazy. 100% support Penny Bright over Suzie and her rag-tags.
Basically Suize is a really sad individual living in a really fantasy world who thinks that their internet trolling and constant jumping on the bandwagons of twitter hashtag slacktivism is actually important. It's not, no one really cares.

Penny Bright link

2/10/2017 07:36:36 am

MY reply to the lies of Suzie Dawson:

http://www.indymedia.org.nz/articles/715

7 March 2013

OCCUPY AUCKLAND WINS HIGH COURT APPEAL!

Mainstream media coverage:

Occupy Auckland barrister Ron Mansfield explains the ruling of Judge Ellis:

http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/checkpoint/audio/2548345/court-ruling-paves-way-for-more-action-by-occupy-movement.asx

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10869644

http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/occupy-auckland-protesters-win-appeal-against-eviction-ruling-5361876

http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/occupy-auckland-protesters-win-appeal-against-eviction-ruling-5361876/video

http://www.3news.co.nz/Occupy-eviction-went-too-far---ruling/tabid/423/articleID/289259/Default.aspx

http://www.3news.co.nz/Legal-victory-for-Occupy-Auckland/tabid/423/articleID/289280/Default.aspx

http://www.bizbilak.com/news/occupy-auckland-protesters-win-appeal-against-eviction-ruling-tvnz

Please be advised, that as an Appellant in my own name, at no time did I express an opinion as a 'Spokesperson' for Occupy Auckland.

A copy of the Appeal decision of High Court Justice Ellis is available on

www.occupyaucklandvsaucklandcouncilappeal.org.nz

a website for which I take full personal responsibility for content.

Also on this above-mentioned website are copies of my key legal submissions, as an Appellant in my own name, so people can read them for themselves.

The main reason I organised the setting up of this website, was to counter the defamatory lies about myself being spread by Suzette Maree Dawson, which she has published on her own private website http://occupysavvy.com

Suzette Maree Dawson published on her above-mentioned private website a statement by Ben Cooney ('Redstar') during his livestream video coverage of the protest against the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) protest on 8 December 2012:

"There's Penny Bright - SIS informant".

The FACTS are, that I was one of 12 people responsible for organising Auckland anti-Springbok Tour protests in 1981, I was named in Muldoon's SIS list as a 'subversive', and have never been able to get a copy of my SIS file.

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0711/S00086.htm

If people think I'm going to put up with these sorts of filthy defamatory lies, when I have had a proven track record going back over 40 years as an activist - think again.

I strongly recommend that those involved in the 'protest' / 'activist' movement, exercise commonsense and due diligence?

If people come from nowhere, with no proven track record in the 'protest' / 'activist' movement, and make a beeline for controlling the message, or means of getting the message out - act in ways which cause dissension or conflict within the group, spread misinformation / disinformation about people, without facts and evidence to back it up - BEWARE!!!

Being involved in 'media' gives such people the ability to mix and mingle and take photos from inside the ranks of the 'protest' movement.

Where exactly are those photos going?

BEWARE of those who act like the 1%, without openness, transparency or democratic accountability.

Why is it that as a (successful) Appellant in the Occupy Auckland Appeal, I cannot post this information up on the Occupy Auckland facebook page?

WHO are 'Admin' currently responsible for the Occupy Auckland facebook page, and why am I being blocked?

I note a Press Release up on Scoop - in the name of Occupy Auckland.

Who put out this Press Release?

On whose authority?

As a NAMED APPELLENT in this Occupy Auckland vs Auckland Council Appeal - I for one was never contacted by this now mysterious, anonymous and apparently secretive 'Occupy Auckland' - who do NOT have permission or any authority to speak on my behalf.

http://auckland.scoop.co.nz/2013/03/vindication-for-occupy-auckland/

WHO now are 'Occupy Auckland'?
Without transparency - there is no accountability.

When / where was the Occupy Auckland General Assembly that discussed the Appeal, and authorised this Press Release?

I note that Suzette Maree Dawson and her private website 'occupy savvy' did NOT attend the hearing of the Occupy Auckland vs Auckland Council Appeal, and did not publish any of my legal documents, which arguably played a role in helping achieve this significant victory for Occupy Auckland, both locally, nationally and internationally?

Remember Rob Gilchrist - the Police informant who infiltrated the animal rights movement?

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sunday-star-times/features/760466/The-activist-who-turned-police-informer

Learn the lessons folks!

I for one, am not interested in working with 'idiots, sheep, amateurs, saboteurs or provocateurs'.

Decent people, with good hearts, brains, guts and a basic understanding of the principles of natural justice, are those with whom I will work, on an issue by issue basis, where we have common cause.

In New Zealand, we have the basic human right to 'freedom of association'.

Those who choose to associat