Conclusive Proof That The USA Has NEVER Landed On The Moon! Jarrah White

3/9/2015

Conclusive Proof That The USA Has NEVER Landed On The Moon! Jarrah White

26_aug_jarrah_white_vinny_eastwood_show_2015.mp3
File Size:	100800 kb
File Type:	mp3

Download File

The First Time I interviewed Jarrah White I wasn't entirely sure whether or not the US went to the moon, but after it, I was utterly convinced that they faked the moon landing and have never set foot on the moon at all even to this day!
The reason for my radical change in position was his unflinching facts recited in a concise and accurate manner using primary & official sources that completely contradict the lies, misinformation and propaganda propagated by NASA and others.

Youtube Audio Version (NO Ads Or Music)

yt_audio_26_aug_jarrah_white_vinny_eastwood_show_2015.mp3
File Size:	91038 kb
File Type:	mp3

Download File

Watch On Youtube: Conclusive Proof That The USA Has NEVER Landed On The Moon! Jarrah White http://youtu.be/3_uSyUBjFUo

PLEASE SUPPORT VINNY EASTWOOD AND START GIFTING $5 A MONTH AT www.thevinnyeastwoodshow.com

15 Comments

Bob

9/10/2015 03:49:16 am

Sorry, but I guess I consider a 'whistleblower' to be someone who actually worked on Apollo (Grumman, North American, NASA employee) or someone who was paid to fabricate deceptive video or photographic material, coming forward with real evidence of a hoax. That would be actual proof of fakery that the moon hoax crowd has NEVER been able to produce.
As it stands, Jarrah White is nothing more that a self-obsessed conspiracy theorist who can knock out a better-than-average YouTube video. He comes off sounding very slick and informed (like any good con man), but passion does not equal intellect, and he's in way over his head when confronted with the actual doctorate-level science it took to get to the moon. He runs for the hills, or deletes the posts of anyone who tears any holes in his pseudo-scientific "experiments.'
If you're looking for real answers in the moon hoax argument, he's not your guy. Don't want to believe NASA? Fine. There's plenty of third-party evidence that we landed on the moon. Not once, but 6 times. 24 guys made the trip and back, 12 of them walked. It's not as sexy as being a non-conformist and screaming "FAKE," but it's the truth.

Barry

15/12/2015 01:43:55 am

Please provide evidence to support your accusation that Jarrah deletes posts. His videos contain many negative comments, some of them quite nasty. They are not deleted. Even when someone gets blocked, such as for excessive personal attacks, their comments remain.
And where is your evidence he runs from opponents? On the contrary, they run from him, as none dare go head-to-head in a debate. At a TAM-8 conference Apollo defender Phil Plait backed out of an interview with Jarrah, and then went on to deliver a lecture in which he invited anyone who wants to argue against his position to 'bring it': http://youtu.be/dZ1LUmRWOF0 - what a hypocrite!
And what third-party evidence do you speak of? NASA had control over all radio telescopes used to track Apollo. No 3rd party claims to have tracked the command module all the way to the Moon and/or back. This was discussed in the audio near 15:00. I can only assume you haven't listened to it, which would explain why you don't address a single point it makes.

Bob

17/12/2015 08:48:26 am

Let's see, deleted posts - didn't have to look very far. I went to the first MoonFaker video on the YouTube search, and stopped counting at 10 for the number of snarky Jarrah responses to comments that no longer exist anywhere in the entire comment section. And by the way, blocking anybody's comments is a coward's way to dodge inconvenient rhetoric. Jarrah calls Apollo astronauts liars and conspirators, and NASA management murderers of Apollo 1 flight crew, so he doesn't get to whine when anybody calls bullshit on his half-baked theories.
The Bochum Observatory in Germany and Jodrell Bank - not under NASA control in any way, and both intercepted single-ended radio comm along with numerous ham radio operators in US and around the world. Jarrah can say what he likes about Jodrell Bank, but these guys are pros, and they know their Doppler vectors and where their dishes are pointing. Bochum also downloaded single-ended TV transmissions from Apollo 15 and 16 missions, and they still have the 2-inch quad tapes in their archive. (call yourself, ask for Heinrich) There is much more, but you wouldn't listen anyway.
And by the way, Jarrah White (and his lack of qualification) isn't the issue. The issue is whether we went of not, and you still don't have any proof - any witness. All you have is conjecture, He needs to stop making ad-nauseum videos like "Jarrah White Takes a Mid-Afternoon Dump Pt 3" and start spending his time getting some REAL PROOF. Find a witness willing to go on the record - a deathbed confession. Get an Apollo worker or footage-faking tech to make a statement, and then you'd have solid evidence of a hoax. The incentive would be there - a legit Apollo fraud interview would command a million dollar+ payday from numerous media outlets.
But you don't have that. You likely never will. And until you do, you're just pissing into the wind.

Barry

18/12/2015 01:16:10 am

See below - had to make a new post because there's no Reply button beneath your latest post.

pascal link

26/3/2016 04:50:53 am

That"s right Barry; is he afraid of being countered?
Here is my reply to him:
You are wrong to think that Jodrell bank was completely out of NASA control.
Jodrell bank was using radar equipment provided by NASA and which was under the control of NASA engineers.
The NASA engineers were not proud about what they were asked to do, that's why they gave hints that the plot following Eagle was fake:
http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/xpascal/MoonHoax/JodrellRadar/JodrellRadar.HTM

pascal link

26/3/2016 04:35:41 am

Those that you are talking about, who really worked for Apollo, have talked out in fact, perhaps not directly, but most certainly indirectly:
- Those who made the photos and videos have given plenty of hints by inserting a mass of intentional errors in the photos and videos: The pairs of photos contradict each other, and I can demonstrate it, and the photos and videos taken in the same time systematically contradict each other, and I can also demonstrate it (I have made plenty of videos to prove it).
- And the engineers who wrote the technical documentation also gave plenty of hints: All the technical documents writen by NASA engineers about Apollo are filled with intentional nonsense and jokes; there is not a single electronic interface described in the technical manual of the lunar module which does not contain intentional errors.
They cannot directly talk out, for it would mean death for them; they don't want to end up like the astronauts of Apollo 1, or Thomas Baron who died in very convenient "accidents", which were in fact disguised murders.

Barry

18/12/2015 01:12:09 am

@Bob
1. It's possible for users to remove their own comments. I don't see why he'd delete a comment if he replied to it. It's also been known for a YT glitch to make comments disappear, particularly if they're years old.
2. It's perfectly acceptable to block people who use excessive personal attacks. If such people had valid arguments they could give them politely and remain unblocked.
3. No third party tracked Apollo all the way to the Moon. Jodrell Bank picked up a signal from near the Moon, which could have been relayed from an unmanned probe. A few ham operators picked up isolated transmissions that could have been likewise relayed - see the FAQ page: moonfaker.com/faqs.html
4. You don't need confessions to prove or disprove a historical event, otherwise any accused person who remained silent would walk free. We can build a strong case by looking at the physical evidence - some of which is discussed in the audio that you haven't addressed. Perhaps you could start with why so the 'moon rocks' contain so much water and rust.
Another good one is how rover tracks in LRO photographs completely disappear outside the landing area - youtu.be/Qc2kijG8YdY - No Apollo defender has a logical explanation for it.

Bob

18/12/2015 05:49:20 am

Sorry junior, you're making claims that try and refute a dozen moon-walking eyewitnesses, hundreds of thousands of people who built and monitored the spacecraft and equipment, days/weeks worth of film and video, thousands of still photos, years worth of data from multiple experiments left on the lunar soil, warehouses full of documentation, and hundreds of peer-reviewed papers on the data and its conclusions.
Habaes corpus - produce the corpse. No corpse, no murder. No witness, no hoax. Your, "I don't need a witness" bullshit may fly on the bonehead internet, but not in the real world, the press, or the legitimate scientific community. There would have been hundreds of techs to fake the motion picture film, video and stills with only optical and analog 1967 gear, and digital compositing 20 years away. And you haven't come up with one.
NO Hollywood effects specialists or DP's have come out in favor of a hoax, and NO real scientists to back up your infantile arguments. And no witnesses to go on the record. Just a bunch of Jr High students like you who idolize dim bulbs like Jarrah White and his YouTube videos.
Find a witness, and the world will listen. Until then you remain the laughingstock of the scientific world.
You, like Jarrah White, are just like the kids in special class. You're so far behind, you think you're ahead.

Barry

30/12/2015 11:35:08 pm

Government programs can be kept secret indefinitely apparently, even when many people are involved. The Manhattan Project employed 130,000 people and was kept secret for 5 years. The Soviet N1 moon-landing program was secret for over 40 years, up until the fall of the Soviet Union. And the details of what goes on in Area 51 are still kept secret. So the fact that nobody's squealing on Apollo doesn't prove anything. People can be kept quiet by threats against them and their family - the latter of which would make deathbed confessions unlikely.

Your "No witness, no hoax" is illogical. Scientists rely on physical evidence for proof, not witnesses. Habeas corpus - perhaps you mean Corpus Delicti? Apparently it's not a solid rule: defensewiki.ibj.org/index.php/Corpus_Delecti. But it's also about evidence rather than testimony so I don't see the relevance.

About professional scientists, if they were confident about their beliefs they should be happy to debate hoax proponents. This would bolster their career and the image of the space program. Instead they tend to avoid the subject or speak of it only when nobody is present to counter them. I suspect the reason is that so much of the space program and science in general is government funded and they don't want to damage their or their colleges job prospects.

You still haven't addressed any of the hoax evidence; particularly the two anomalies I mentioned. That's hardly surprising since no other Apollo defender can either. Keep in mind the longer you don't address it, the more people reading this will be convinced it's because you don't have an answer.

FYI, I'm of retirement age and certainly no kid. Not that it should matter.

pascal link

26/3/2016 05:04:30 am

Those who only made manual work on the lunar module and command module had no reason to know anything about the hoax, they were just doing what they were told to do.
There were engineers who knew of course, but they could not directly talk out, it was much too dangerous for them.
All they could do was to give hints of the hoax for those who would be able to see them, and that's what they did, and I'm qualified enough to see their hints, and that's why I am so convinced of the hoax.

Bob

5/1/2016 07:37:00 am

Sorry, but the Soviets penetrated the Manhattan Project in 1943, and the CIA had satellite photos of the N1 rocket on the pad even before the first of its four failed test flights, and just try going to court without a witness when the other side has 12 decorated combat and civilian test pilots (not to mention war heroes) ready to take the stand.
NASA stopped trying to reason with hoax believers 30 years ago when it realized it was like trying to teach a pig to sing, It only frustrates you, and annoys the pig. I would hope NASA never spends another dime or moment of effort trying to communicate with people who don't believe a word they say anyway. It's pointless. They've got better things going forward like sending probes to other planets and preparing the next generation of American spacecraft and flight crews.
Hoax believers on the other hand are caught in a backward 46-year infinite loop of stupidity and willful ignorance.
What 'evidence'? That nobody apart from NASA and USSR tracked Apollo moment-by-moment all the way to the moon and back? Big fucking deal. Third-party, professional (named above) observatories tracked both the command module in lunar orbit, and intercepted single-ended radio, TV and telemetry (you gloss over how big a deal that 'single-ended' part is because you don't understand the implications of it) from the lunar surface on each mission. They Apollo crews had to get there somehow to make those signals. You guys blather on about how some mystery NASA relay spacecraft passed those multiple signals around, but can never quite name who designed it, who built it, who launched it, on what vehicle, on what date, or provide - wait for it - any witness to those events.
And you're high if you think the LRO images don't show the entire rover/foot tracks profile. Pick a mission: http://www.lroc.asu.edu/featured_sites/
Believe what you like, but the 'Aussie genius' you're fawning over here shows his true idiotic colors in one great video moment. Just watch Jarrah White stomp into a box of prop regolith substitute in his garage, without 1/6g, without a vacuum, and then declare to transfixed Jr High-aged internet lemmings that the astronauts footprints were 'impossible,' and have the nerve to call the whole thing 'scientific.'
If you're really of retirement age, you should know better.

pascal

26/3/2016 05:08:00 am

The russians also had their secrets that the alericans knew about and accepted to cover up.
It was the game of "I cover you up if you also do".
After the flight of Gagarin, articles appeared in the american newspapers which were calling it a hoax, and were explaining why his exploit was not credible; and yet the american government accepted it; there had to be a counterpart.

Bob

31/8/2016 07:44:46 am

Reading your comments here, I was going to politely say that you could use some work on your critical thinking skills, but it's hopeless. You're just a moron. Please do not attempt a career in science - it will only frustrate you, and annoy the people who would have to deal with you.
Like the kids in special class, you're so far behind, you think you're ahead.

21/9/2016 07:58:28 am

Dear Bob, aside from personally offending other people, preaching that you believe anything that anyone from NASA states without scientific evidence and showing you lack of self control, there wasn't much more convincing evidence of your thoughts and believes. You just proved to be an arrongannt intolerant person, unable to debate with other and most sadly, completely unable to convince anyone, from what I saw. So just go waste your time someplace else and stop hating so much, man. It's just sad.

Bob

18/4/2017 07:49:27 am

Well Vi,you can call me whatever you like, but by preaching that you blindly believe everything Jarrah White says without question, you're propagating a lie. And this is bigger than just some slick, but under-educated kid from Australia, it's about people being drawn to anti-science and anti-intellectualism. It's fun to think that you've got inside knowledge that's fooled millions of people for half a century, but in the case of Jarrah White and the moon hoax, you're being conned.
I lived and worked on Florida's Space Coast for over 12 years. I got to know quite a few people who uprooted their families and moved to towns like Titusville or Cocoa Beach to work on project Apollo. And that's not official 'NASA' talking, it's just people, very smart people - engineers and technicians who understand the doctorate-level math and physics that it took to build the hardware and fly the missions. Jarrah White could have tried to talk to people like this, and seen if he could get one of them to 'come clean' and expose the hoax, but he's too busy making self-serving YouTube videos that are full of mistakes in math and logic to actually prove a case for a cover-up or an Apollo deception.
There were over 400,000 people that worked in some way on the Apollo missions. That's a lot of people to keep quiet for over 50 years. But go ahead, Believe everything that Jarrah White says. Any science or math teacher can show you the blatant errors he makes in his videos, because he really doesn't understand what he's talking about. You want to buy this nonsense whole, fine. But that makes you part of the problem.