REAL climate data that changes everything! Ralph Ellis

28/2/2019

REAL Climate Data That Changes Everything! Ralph Ellis

Ralph Ellis: https://www.patreon.com/ralfellis
Climate change to many is a forgone conclusion,
is this because we looked at the data, were skeptical,
then proved it to ourselves by personally exploring the evidence?
Or because the media and their government repeated it a thousand times day?
We look into the REAL climate data that shows what is actually going on,
The truth might surprise you!
Ralph On Youtube: www.youtube.com/c/RalphEllis
On Facebook: www.facebook.com/ralph.ellis.144

Audio Version

13_feb_real_climate_change_data_changes_everything__ralph_ellis_2019.mp3
File Size:	91689 kb
File Type:	mp3

Download File

Watch On Youtube: REAL climate data that changes everything! Ralph Ellis youtu.be/-4ud-nYeSKg

SUBSCRIBE AND CLICK THE LITTLE BELL FOR NEWEST VIDEO UPDATES!

The Vinny Eastwood Show,
Helping The Truth Be Heard Since 2008!

DONATE AND SUPPORT THE SHOW!
Official Paypal Email: guerillamedia77@gmail.com
Paypal buttons at http://www.thevinnyeastwoodshow.com/
Official Kiwibank: VMAN COMPANIES LIMITED
38-9010-0455296-00
Official Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/vinnyeastwood

YOU CAN ALSO HELP BY SHARING! LIKING! COMMENTING!
SUBSCRIBING & CLICKING THE LITTLE BELL FOR NOTIFICATIONS!

The Vinny Eastwood Show

Official Website: http://www.thevinnyeastwoodshow.com/
Official Youtube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/c/vinnyeastwoodnz
Official Twitter: http://twitter.com/guerillamedia
Official Facebook Group: http://www.facebook.com/groups/1410539889213406/
Official Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/VinnyEastwoodShow/

American Freedom Radio

Official Website:
http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/
Official Youtube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCM2yrEFVWPKvBiRjlcFNtXw
Official Twitter:
https://twitter.com/AFRadioTV
Official Facebook Group:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/952799288134355/
Official Facebook Page:
https://www.facebook.com/americanfreedomradio/

Vinny & The Vendettas

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/vinnyandthevendettas
Web:
https://www.thevinnyeastwoodshow.com/vinnyandthevendettas.html
Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCx9TdJjc4TfqN7S0PDjOSBA
Soundcloud:
https://soundcloud.com/user-815491437

4 Comments

Alberta Vince

3/3/2019 11:20:41 am

Great show!

Ralph Ellis is totally correct in his assumption that the anthropogenic global warming theory is “wrong” and I’d like to add a few pointers which might help solidify the conviction that it’s completely bogus.

First off, there is no such thing as a “reinforcing heat feedback loop”. Refer to the second law of thermodynamics which deals with entropy and diminishing returns where it deals with heat transfer. Heat can only be transferred from a higher temperature body to a lower temperature body. Simply put, gas molecules in the sky must be warmer than the earth in order for heat to flow from sky to earth. Now, while this CAN happen and does -where a cloud cover will prevent freezing underneath- it simply NEVER involves CO2! It only happens with water vapor and there’s a reason for that which is called “enthalpy”.

Enthalpy is the heat absorbed in the process of changing phase states ... such as converting a liquid into a gas. When one boils a pot of water for instance, the temperature of the water in the pot will remain a constant 212 degrees F. at sea level until the pot boils dry ... no matter how much heat is poured into the pot. The escaping steam will also be a constant 212 degrees F ... so no temperature increase is realized despite enormous amounts of heat being put to the water in the kettle. The energy from the heat is stored in the water vapor produced and expresses itself by expansion rather than by temperature increase.

Water vapor can and does, transfer heat by condensing into snow or rain and serves as a temperature moderator on earth to absorb heat in hot spots and then move that heat to some cooler location but even so, it provides no reinforcing positive heat feedback loop.

CO2 obviously provides no enthalpy since its solid or liquid state is never realized in nature. CO2 also, has less heat retention (specific heat) than the nitrogen and oxygen in our atmosphere.

Methane on the other hand, does have a higher heat storing capability than water vapor but again, methane does not provide the mechanism of enthalpy and therefore has little temperature moderation effect in the atmosphere.

So if CO2 in the atmosphere can NOT “return” heat to the earth and thereby jack up earth temperatures (as dictated by the second law of thermodynamics) ... can it SLOW DOWN the transfer of heat from the earth into space and THEREBY increase earth temperature? Sort of a “blanket” around the earth to “preserve” the earth’s heat?

First of all, there’s far too LITTLE CO2 in the atmosphere to affect anything. Really. It’s a mere trace gas. There’s 23 times more argon in the atmosphere than CO2!

But even if there was enough CO2 in the atmosphere to permit meaningful calculations ... so that it MIGHT “trap heat” and slow down heat transfer from the earth into space via IR radiation, would this INCREASE the earth’s temperature?

No, not at all ... and to illustrate, let’s use a more intuitive example of energy levels demonstrated by water and height.

Suppose you were in a 6 story apartment and your suite got flooded by a water leak from a broken toilet. The water could either flow straight down from your balcony to the ground or it could run into the hallway and down the emergency exit stairs to the main floor. If it went straight over the balcony the water would get to the ground very quickly but if it went down the stairs, the steps would “slow down” the speed of the water so that it would take a lot longer to get to the bottom.

Regardless of which route the water took, it would NOT affect the water level (height/pressure/temperature) in your suite. The only way a backup of water flow could affect the level of water on your floor is if the water level OUTSIDE of your suite reached equilibrium with the inside of your suite and THEN it would begin to raise the level inside of your suite. Same law of theremodynamics applies: flow is established by pressure level and can never go backwards.

Some other points to consider ...

#1

If we assume that the scientific explanation is correct, that all of the free oxygen (O2) in our atmosphere is derived by photosynthesis from plant life and that plants obtain their supply of CO2 from the atmosphere to create carbohydrates from water and carbon dioxide and expel oxygen in the process ... then the amount of oxygen they expel happens to be equal to the volume of CO2 that they ingest.

CO2 + H2O -> CHO + O2

Not quite that simple but effectively, yes. One atom of oxygen goes into forming the carbohydrate and two atoms are released as a molecule of O2, into the atmosphere.

But there's a problem with this assumption because the atmosphere contains 21% of its volume in oxygen while the supply of carbon dioxide is a mere .04%! How can plants produce oxygen out of "nothing"? If they ge

Chris Paul

25/4/2019 08:22:03 am

The term "Economical With The Truth" was originally from Margaret Thatcher's Cabinet Secretary Sir Robert Temple Armstrong, who was attempting to stop publication of a book called "Spy Catcher" in Australia. Under Cross Examination by a young Lawyer called Malcolm Turnbull he admitted that he had been "economical with the truth". As a reward for his cleverness and to prevent him from pissing into the tent from the outside, Turnbull was offered the Faustian Deal and went on to become CEO for Goldman Sachs in Australia and then Prime Minister. He supped from The Devil's Cup and the rest is history, as THEY say.

Alberta Vince

3/3/2019 12:23:37 pm

If they get their CO2 supply from the atmosphere, there would need to be a little more than 21% of the atmosphere composed of CO2.

Which means that plants are obviously getting MOST of their CO2 supply from some source other than the atmosphere. What is that source?

#2

We know that CO2 is heavier than air. We know that CO2, when released in a mass, will accumulate in LOW spots. We've all seen the results of CO2 being released into the air to create artificial fog in special stage effects: it rolls DOWN over the edges of the stage. In 1986 an entire village in Cameroon Africa was asphyxiated by a huge cloud of CO2 rolling down a mountain side from Lake Nyos up above,
blanketing them, resulting in the death of 1,746 people and 3,500 livestock.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Nyos_disaster

CO2 is heavier than air and SHOULD be killing all of us from the amount we release, simply by breathing and operating internal combustion engines. Why ISN'T the ground blanketed with a layer of CO2, since it's heavier than air? Where does it GO ... when released in substantial quantities?

#3

"Scientists believe that phytoplankton contribute between 50 to 85 percent of the oxygen in Earth’s atmosphere. They aren’t sure because it’s a tough thing to calculate." https://earthsky.org/earth/how-much-do-oceans-add-to-worlds-oxygen

“Phytoplankton absorb energy from the Sun and nutrients from the water to produce their own food. In the process of photosynthesis, phytoplankton release molecular oxygen (O2) into the water. It is estimated that between 50% and 85% of the world's oxygen is produced via phytoplankton photosynthesis.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phytoplankton

Now wait a minute ...

If TREES and greenery on the earth's land mass AREN'T producing "much" oxygen and most of the atmospheric oxygen is produced by phytoplankton ... what's the explanation for the difference between them? And where are the air currents to SHOW how CO2 is travelling to vast bodies of water? Could it be that CO2 is actually traveling by WATER to get to the phytoplankton?

Maybe CO2 -after being released- heads for the ground and is absorbed by moisture which gradually makes its way to large water bodies in the form of carbonic acid and is taken up by phytoplankton DIRECTLY from the water?

Or, another possibility ...

Since carbohydrates are created from water and carbon dioxide by absorbing energy from the sun ...
... perhaps hydrocarbons can be created by reversing the burning process ... by adding heat and pressure to water and carbon dioxide under certain conditions?

Yes, I see that it's been done.

“Liquid hydrocarbon fuel created from CO2 and water in breakthrough one-step process”
https://newatlas.com/co2-water-hydrocarbon-fuel-uta/41976/

Aha! Since the earth contains a lot of internal heat and pressure (and even light) ... it's totally feasible that hydrocarbons are formed INSIDE of the earth at the bottom of oceans, resulting in a large release of oxygen through the water, into the atmosphere above. Maybe it's NOT the phytoplankten after all, creating this large amount of oxygen ... or maybe it's a combination of the two ... resulting in MOST of the oxygen being sourced from the ocean instead of from land-based greenery?

In all of the theories and assumptions being propagated, one factor is never included or discussed and that’s the internal heat engine inside of the earth. Our planet is merely “cooling” say the scientists. The planet is only 8000 miles across and has been cooling for 4 billion years and yet ... is somehow still producing enough heat to cause volcanic eruptions, plate movement and earthquakes?

C’mon now: you DON’T get expressed energy outburst from cooling! That’s like the twin towers erupting in geysers from falling!~

Look at the planets which have electromagnetic fields vs those which don’t ... and then look for temperatures and volcanic activity. Mars is dead and cold with no electromagnetic field. Venus is extremely hot and volcanic and has an EM field. Mercury, which is closer to the sun than Venus, is cooler than Venus and has no electromagnetic field.

Is it possible that the heat engine inside of our planet is actually producing oxygen from carbon dioxide in the process of manufacturing the hydrocarbons we pump out of the ground? If so, we HAVE free and renewable energy at our disposal already! Why complicate matters by trying to force some other kind of “sustainable” method? It wouldn’t matter WHAT kind of energy we can tap into; the psychopaths will always grab control and make it scarce and expensive for us.

Chris Paul

22/4/2019 08:34:34 am

No, Uno is not 'God' but 'Police - do what THEY do and reverse the letters: "On You".

The New World Order (NWO) is exactly that under this analysis - OWN!