We need cookies... Don't eat ze bugs.
The establishment media and the scientific dictatorship are promoting brain-eating vaccines that virtually lobotomize people and rewire their minds into a state of subservient compliance so that their natural instinct to get angry and rebel against the tyranny being imposed upon them is neutered and sterilized.
“Academics say they are close to developing the first vaccine for stress – a single jab that would help us relax without slowing down,” reports the Daily Mail. Dr Robert Sapolsky, professor of neuroscience at Stanford University in California, says the vaccine is intended to impose a state of “focused calm” by altering brain chemistry. The proposals ominously hark back to George Lucas’ 1971 dystopian chiller TXH 1138, in which the population is controlled and subjugated through the use of special drugs to suppress emotion. Feeling stress, getting angry, expressing emotion and displaying passion are all innate, natural and vital aspects of human behavior. Reacting with stress to dangerous or uncomfortable situations is an essential and healthy response, and is one shared by just about every living thing on the planet. Scientists are now telling us that getting angry, upset and passionate is abnormal and needs to be “treated” through a fresh dose of pharmaceutical drugs and injections that will virtually lobotomize us into submissive compliance. This is blatantly a part of the full spectrum assault on our minds, our bodies and our nervous system through the contamination of our food and water supply. The new research on brain-altering vaccines dovetails with proposals to add lithium to the water supply in order to treat “mood disorders”. Link to original story: http://www.infowars.com/establishment-media-pushes-brain-eating-vaccines/
3 Comments
HIDDEN IN THE HEALTHCARE BILL IS A LOOPHOLE .INSURANCE COMPANIES WILL USE SPECIAL SOFTWARE TO FIND OUT FOR EXAMPLE , THE SLIGHTEST MISSWORDING IN THE PAPERWORK AND OTHER CON'S TO DROP PEOPLES POLICIES ONCE THEY BECOME SICK. IE, CANCER OR SOMETHING SERIOUS AND EXPENSIVE .JUST CALL IT NAZICARE.
Benjamin is our special Kiwi Collaborator on today's show 17, August 2010. Written by Benjamin Easton I was born on the 23rd of March 1960 in Wellington Hospital. I am the youngest of four children. Both of my parents are still alive. My father, Richard was born in Glasgow in Scotland and my mother Jane in Devon in England. I am the only one of their children or ancestors to have been born in New Zealand. I am proud to be a first generation New Zealand citizen, not withstanding an affinity if not loyalty for England. I hope my story, my journey and its progress will be interesting and valuable. In 2004 I walked from Auckland to Wellington. Wellington is south of Auckland. This was about a month after an earlier walk between Auckland to Waitangi. Waitangi is north of Auckland. Walking in this manner in the native language (te reo) Maori is called a hikoi. I consider my journey at present as a separated father from his children and as well as a political busker is better described as a hikoi. Waitangi is where our nation's Treaty of Waitangi was signed in 1840. There are two versions of the treaty. There is a Maori version called Te Tiriti o Waitangi and the English version called The Treaty of Waitangi. The "treaty" (which is an ambiguous term for two versions) is often referred to as the country's founding document. I contest this in fact. A lesser known document signed 5 years earlier, titled the Declaration of Inependence is considered by some Maori as the first constitution of the nation. It granted the indigenous people, collected as a group of northern tribes in ambition that any differences would be worked through in time. My intention to take on this long walk was to bring the injustices done to Maori through colonial oppression to unity for a balance against the current and prevalent injustices performed on the citizenship through family law. My reason for taking on this difficult task was to directly challenge those injustices in practice through family law. I am still trying to create that unity against two highly protected cultures engaged in extraordinary regimes of practiced injustice. Obviously my own story of engagement with family law has driven my energy. If I rely on my seven years of political as uneducated writing much of the material, especially that which is philisophical, will be difficult to read. I am challenged that my writing style is unique. For my part, I genuinely attempt to moderate my style to be more readible, yet stay defiant that if I vary too much from what I think, as to how it is written an original and particularly specific point can be lost. Additional to the posts of my older writing and its consistency with the newer material, I will post from time to time cartoons. This year's Christmas cartoon is likely to confuse most, especially those not familiar with New Zealand politics. Please feel free to contribute and ask me questions as you will or engage me in political debate. At the moment my politics are active challenging past and present practices in New Zealand law. As time progresses with our political climate those politics will develop into a consistency with religion and the Middle East. I hope you join me as my long and difficult hikoi advances forth into the Internet's timeless box of limiting silence. Google Ventures and In-Q-Tel, the investment arm of the CIA, have provided funding to a company that monitors all the noise on the web looking for connections between people, groups and events, according to Wired.
Recorded Future monitors traffic on Facebook, Twitter, news sites, blogs and other sites to help companies connect the dots between people, places and events. (Credit: CNET News) The company, Recorded Future, offers a Temporal Analytics Engine for predictive analysis, allowing people to "visualise the future, past or present". In addition, In-Q-Tel and Google Ventures both have seats on the board Recorded Future and have been "very helpful", providing advice to the start-up, chief executive Christopher Ahlberg, an ex-Swedish Army ranger, told Wired in an article last week. The amount of the investments is undisclosed, but it was less than US$10 million each and was given in 2009, the article said. This may be the first time Google and the CIA have funded the same firm, but it's not the first time they've worked together. Google has sold servers to intelligence agencies and reportedly sought aid from the NSA after it was targeted in attacks it said originated in China. In-Q-Tel also had provided backing to Keyhole before Google acquired the mapping company to use in its technology in Google Earth. Via CNET URL:http://www.zdnet.com.au/google-cia-fund-analytics-firm-report-339304924.htm Martyn "Bomber" Bradburys submission to the Education and Science Select Committee looking at the impact of the bill to make students associations voluntary, the issue is that the super city legislation signals a quick death to the cultural atmosphere in New Zealand universities.
Compulsory student unions makes the student politics, arts and journalism blossom with the pooled resources responsible for many of our top Political commentators and journalists as students, cutting their teeth on the issues mainstream media won't touch. Roger Douglas' neo-liberal schemes are coming to fruition. MR NEWS www.tumeke.blogspot.com www.guerillamedia.co.nz www.thevinnyeastwoodshow.com California is collapsing. Don't let anyone fool you.
Paul Craig Roberts
Infowars.com The United States is running out of time to get its budget and trade deficits under control. Despite the urgency of the situation, 2010 has been wasted in hype about a non-existent recovery. As recently as August 2 Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner penned a New York Times column, “Welcome to the Recovery.” As John Williams (shadowstats.com) has made clear on many occasions, an appearance of recovery was created by over-counting employment and undercounting inflation. Warnings by Williams, Gerald Celente, and myself have gone unheeded, but our warnings recently had echoes from Boston University professor Laurence Kotlikoff and from David Stockman, who excoriated the Republican Party for becoming big-spending Democrats. It is encouraging to see some realization that, this time, Washington cannot spend the economy out of recession. The deficits are already too large for the dollar to survive as reserve currency, and deficit spending cannot put Americans back to work in jobs that have been moved offshore. However, the solutions offered by those who are beginning to recognize that there is a problem are discouraging. Kotlikoff thinks the solution is savage Social Security and Medicare cuts or equally savage tax increases or hyperinflation to destroy the vast debts. Perhaps economists lack imagination, or perhaps they don’t want to be cut off from Wall Street and corporate subsidies, but Social Security and Medicare are insufficient at their present levels, especially considering the erosion of private pensions by the dot com, derivative and real estate bubbles. Cuts in Social Security and Medicare, for which people have paid 15 per cent of their earnings all their lives, would result in starvation and deaths from curable diseases. Tax increases make even less sense. It is widely acknowledged that the majority of households cannot survive on one job. Both husband and wife work and often one of the partners has two jobs in order to make ends meet. Raising taxes makes it harder to make ends meet–thus more foreclosures, more food stamps, more homelessness. What kind of economist or humane person thinks this is a solution? Ah, but we will tax the rich. The rich have enough money. They will simply stop earning. Let’s get real. Here is what the government is likely to do. Once Washington realize that the dollar is at risk and that they can no longer finance their wars by borrowing abroad, the government will either levy a tax on private pensions on the grounds that the pensions have accumulated tax-deferred, or the government will require pension fund managers to purchase Treasury debt with our pensions. This will buy the government a bit more time while pension accounts are loaded up with worthless paper. The last Bush budget deficit (2008) was in the $400-500 billion range, about the size of the Chinese, Japanese, and OPEC trade surpluses with the US. Traditionally, these trade surpluses have been recycled to the US and finance the federal budget deficit. In 2009 and 2010 the federal deficit jumped to $1,400 billion, a back-to-back trillion dollar increase. There are not sufficient trade surpluses to finance a deficit this large. From where comes the money? The answer is from individuals fleeing the stock market into “safe” Treasury bonds and from the bankster bailout, not so much the TARP money as the Federal Reserve’s exchange of bank reserves for questionable financial paper such as subprime derivatives. The banks used their excess reserves to purchase Treasury debt. These financing maneuvers are one-time tricks. Once people have fled stocks, that movement into Treasuries is over. The opposition to the bankster bailout likely precludes another. So where does the money come from the next time? The Treasury was able to unload a lot of debt thanks to “the Greek crisis,” which the New York banksters and hedge funds multiplied into “the euro crisis.” The financial press served as a financing arm for the US Treasury by creating panic about European debt and the euro. Central banks and individuals who had taken refuge from the dollar in euros were panicked out of their euros, and they rushed into dollars by purchasing US Treasury debt. Do goods and services expand by the same amount? Imports will increase as US jobs have been offshored and given to foreigners, thus worsening the trade deficit. When the Federal Reserve purchases the Treasury’s new debt issues, the money supply will increase by more than the supply of domestically produced goods and services. Prices are likely to rise. How high will they rise? The longer money is created in order that government can pay its bills, the more likely hyperinflation will be the result. The economy has not recovered. By the end of this year it will be obvious that the collapsing economy means a larger than $1.4 trillion budget deficit to finance. Will it be $2 trillion? Higher? Whatever the size, the rest of the world will see that the dollar is being printed in such quantities that it cannot serve as reserve currency. At that point wholesale dumping of dollars will result as foreign central banks try to unload a worthless currency. The collapse of the dollar will drive up the prices of imports and offshored goods on which Americans are dependent. Wal-Mart shoppers will think they have mistakenly gone into Neiman Marcus. Domestic prices will also explode as a growing money supply chases the supply of goods and services still made in America by Americans. The dollar as reserve currency cannot survive the conflagration. When the dollar goes the US cannot finance its trade deficit. Therefore, imports will fall sharply, thus adding to domestic inflation and, as the US is energy import-dependent, there will be transportation disruptions that will disrupt work and grocery store deliveries. Panic will be the order of the day. Will farms will be raided? Will those trapped in cities resort to riots and looting? Is this the likely future that “our” government and “our patriotic” corporations have created for us? To borrow from Lenin, “What can be done?” Here is what can be done. The wars, which benefit no one but the military-security complex and Israel’s territorial expansion, can be immediately ended. This would reduce the US budget deficit by hundreds of billions of dollars per year. More hundreds of billions of dollars could be saved by cutting the rest of the military budget which, in its present size, exceeds the budgets of all the serious military powers on earth combined. US military spending reflects the unaffordable and unattainable crazed neoconservative goal of US Empire and world hegemony. What fool in Washington thinks that China is going to finance US hegemony over China? The only way that the US will again have an economy is by bringing back the offshored jobs. The loss of these jobs impoverished Americans while producing oversized gains for Wall Street, shareholders, and corporate executives. These jobs can be brought home where they belong by taxing corporations according to where value is added to their product. If value is added to their goods and services in China, corporations would have a high tax rate. If value is added to their goods and services in the US, corporations would have a low tax rate. This change in corporate taxation would offset the cheap foreign labor that has sucked jobs out of America, and it would rebuild the ladders of upward mobility that made America an opportunity society. If the wars are not immediately stopped and the jobs brought back to America, the US is relegated to the trash bin of history. Obviously, the corporations and Wall Street would use their financial power and campaign contributions to block any legislation that would reduce short-term earnings and bonuses by bringing jobs back to America. Americans have no greater enemies than Wall Street and the corporations and their prostitutes in Congress and the White House. The neocons allied with Israel, who control both parties and much of the media, are strung out on the ecstasy of Empire. The United States and the welfare of its 300 million people cannot be restored unless the neocons, Wall Street, the corporations, and their servile slaves in Congress and the White House can be defeated. Without a revolution, Americans are history. Dr. Paul Craig Roberts is the father of Reaganomics and the former head of policy at the Department of Treasury. He is a columnist and was previously an editor for the Wall Street Journal. His latest book, “How the Economy Was Lost: The War of the Worlds,” details why America is disintegrating. Cardiologists propose putting pills beside salt and ketchup to balance heart disease risk.
McDonald's, Burger King and other fast food outlets should offer diners free drugs to compensate for the risk of heart disease, cardiologists proposed today. If burger joints offered cholesterol-lowering statins, customers would offset the unhealthy effects of a cheeseburger and milkshake, according to researchers at Imperial College London. The pills could be placed beside the salt, pepper and tomato ketchup to encourage people to pop one after their meal. The suggestion is made in a paper by Dr Darrel Francis, a cardiologist at Imperial's National Heart and Lung Institute, and colleagues published in the American Journal of Cardiology. The idea was criticised by leading doctors, who said the study could encourage ill-health by prompting even greater consumption of junk food and increasing the belief in "a pill for every ill". Francis said: "Statins do not cut out all of the unhealthy effects of burgers and fries. It's better to avoid fatty food altogether. But in terms of your likelihood of having a heart attack, taking a statin can reduce your risk to more or less the same degree as a fast food meal increases it." People eat fast food despite knowing that it is bad for them. Given that, said Francis: "It makes sense to make risk-reducing supplements available just as easily as the unhealthy condiments that are provided free of charge. It would cost less then 5p per customer - not much different to a sachet of ketchup." The proposal was in line with other established risk-reducing measures such as wearing a seatbelt or buying filtered cigarettes, Francis argued. Professor Steve Field, chairman of the Royal College of General Practitioners, denounced the proposal. "This paper just amazes me," he said. "Let's get real; we should be encouraging healthy lifestyles, not pill popping. This is an unwelcome addition to the 'pill for every ill' attitude that's already much too common. The danger of this research is that some people will become even more complacent about eating fatty food and high calorie food, and might even increase their intake of them." While statins were generally safe they could increase the risk of muscle weakness and, in rare cases, of kidney failure, cataracts and liver problems, Field added. Millions of Britons who have dangerously high cholesterol levels, and those with existing heart problems, take statins regularly to reduce the risk of a heart attack or stroke. Professor Peter Weissberg, medical director of the British Heart Foundation, said: "The suggestion that the harmful effects of a junk food meal might be erased by taking a cholesterol-lowering statin tablet should not be taken literally. Statins are a vital medicine for people with, or at high risk of developing, heart disease. They are not a magic bullet." A group of undertakers in Belgium are proposing a more ecological (but perhaps creepier) alternative to cremation: they hope to dissolve corpses in a caustic solution and flush the resulting liquid and ashes down the drain, which will be recycled at water treatment plants. They contend that the process - known as chemical hydrolysis or resomation - would use less energy than a crematorium and emit no carbon emissions.
"The idea is for the deceased to be placed in a container with water and salts and then pressurised and after a little time, about two hours, mineral ash and liquid is left over," says a spokesman for the Flemish Association of Undertakers. According to the Telegraph, the EU is considering the controversial proposal and if it gets approved, it would mean the procedure could be used across Europe. Understandably, one survey found that many Belgians see the idea as "disturbing". The authorities are now studying whether the leftover liquids can be safely flushed into sewage systems. Interesting enough, it's nothing new in the United States: Maine, Colorado, Florida, Minnesota, Oregon, and Maryland recently approved the same process. It would be interesting to compare hard data between this particular process and other more conventional but still environmentally-friendly options of that final earthly footprint - from a biodegradable casket to digging your own grave. Thankfully, if even after this process you choose not to have your remains flushed in the end, your ashes can still be put into an urn - a comforting thought. Check out these latest videos from our favorite Burgermeister, Jane Burgermeister!
|
REMEMBER TO LIKE! SHARE! SUBSCRIBE! DONATE! www.thevinnyeastwoodshow.com
ALL DONORS GET:
|